AUGUSTO, 27 a.C.-14 d.C., DUPONDIO, Emissione: 22-23 d.C., Zecca di Roma, Rif. bibl. R.I.C., 74; Cohen, 251; Metallo: AE, gr. 12,99, (MR137085), Diam.: mm. 28,89, qBB, (RRR)
Impero Romano, AUGUSTO, 27 a.C.-14 d.C., DUPONDIO, Emissione: 22-23 d.C., D/ DIVVS AVGVSTVS PATER, testa radiata a sinistra, R/ S C, Tempio esastilo con tetto a cupola sormontato da una figura eretta e fiancheggiato da colonne, Zecca di Roma, Rif. bibl. R.I.C., 74; Cohen, 251; Metallo: AE, gr. 12,99, (MR137085), Diam.: mm. 28,89, qBB, (RRR)
L'identificazione del tempio al rovescio della moneta è il soggetto di molti dibattiti tra gli studiosi. Alcuni credono che il tempio sia quello del Divo Augusto, eretto da Tiberio e rappresentato sulle monete di Caligola e Antonino Pio. Comunque, quel tempio era rettangolare con otto colonne ed era ancora in costruzione durante il regno di Tiberio. Altri credono che l'edificio sia il tabernacolo di Marte Ultore (Vendicatore) sul Monte Capitolino (Campidoglio), costruito da Augusto nel 19 a.C. L'ipotesi più accreditata sull'identità del tempio è quella che esso sia il Tempio di Vesta sul Palatino. Secondo Panvini Rosati, questo rovescio riproduce l'Aedes Vestae, per celebrare la carica di Pontifex Maximus, che Augusto assunse dopo la morte di Lepido. (Tratto da: https://www.cointalk.com/threads/augustus-temple-dupondius.258348/)
The identification of the temple on the reverse of the coin is the subject of much debate among scholars. Some believe that the temple is that of Divus Augustus which was erected by Tiberius and depicted on coins of Caligula and Antoninus Pius. However, that temple was rectangular with eight columns and was still in construction during Tiberius' reign. Others believe the edifice to be the tabernacle of Mars Ultor on the Capitoline Hill, constructed by Augustus in 19 BC. The most accepted current opinion on the identity of the temple is that it is Vesta's temple on the Palatine Hill. According to Panvini Rosati, this reverse reproduces the aedes Vestae in Palatio, to record the office of Pontifex Maximus, which Augustus assumed following the death of Lepidus. (Cited from: https://www.cointalk.com/threads/augustus-temple-dupondius.258348/)
One important aspect that determines the value of a coin is the correct grading of it. For this reason we study the techniques of production, carefully analyzing each exemplar by powerful lenses and microscope if necessary.
We use the European system of grading for our coins, ranging from VG (Very Good) to BU (Brilliant Uncirculated).
Shown below is the system adopted with a brief description for each grade.
VG Very Good · F Fine · VF Very Fine · EF Extremely Fine · BU Brilliant Uncirculated.
Proof isn't properly a grade but a special method of production. In the histogram present in the data sheet of each exemplar is graphically reported the level of the grade. It's adopted a grading in seventieths to help the Asian and American collectors accustomed to the Sheldon Grading System.
Another notable aspect in determining the value of a coin is the rarity. Coins have been produced in great quantity since ancient times and, being "industrial products", they're often common objects. But in many cases, this isn't true.
There are exemplars very difficult to find; in some cases, the rarity is subordinated to the big demand of collectors for certain symbolical issues (e.g. the coins of Julius Caesar). In the histogram, the level of rarity of the item is graphically reported in percentage, from a low percentage for very common coins (C) to 100% for extremely rare ones (RRRRR).
C Common · NC Not common · R Rare · RR Very rare · RRR Particularly rare · RRRR Extremely rare · RRRRR Of the greatest rarity.
Also the quality and the visual aspect of a coin's metal is a key factor in rating it. The metal of a coin can be damaged by the time goes on. Sometimes the defects can be caused by the low quality metal used during the minting process, or by an improper cleaning or a bad restoration.
Another aspect examined in this parameter is the patina, if present. With time, a thin layer can appear on the surface of a coin. An old collection patina can increase the charm of a coin and its value. The original old patinas attract the collectors. We remark the adjective original because in many cases the patinas are artificial. Artificial patinas or modern oxidations will result in a lower rating. Aggressive polishing can damage the metal of a coin causing a low rating.
For the ancient coins, the style of the coin dies used for the minting is really important.
Coins with a coarse style will receive a low rating in the histogram. Otherwise, coins with a fine style will receive a higher evaluation up to the maximum for the most artistic ones.
In the evaluation of the coins, especially the hammered ancient ones, it is very important to examine deeply the process of production and the materials used.
Exemplars minted in a large, not fractured flan and well centered will receive a high rating. Coins with high reliefs will receive a high evaluation reported in the histogram.
On the contrary, exemplars with damaged flan, not centered and with low reliefs will receive a lower rating. The same importance is reserved for the production with not worn out or not rusted coin dies.
Another significant element to take in consideration when determining the value of a coin is the provenance or pedigree, that is the certification of the various passages of the coin in the numismatic market and collections.
A coin with an old provenance, sold in prestigious auctions (Santamaria, Leu, Frank Sternberg et al.) or displayed in important collections (A. Moretti, A. Magnaguti, S. Pozzi etc.), will receive a higher percentage in the histogram than another one with a more recent or less prestigious pedigree.
All the coins offered by Moruzzi Numismatica have an absolutely legal provenance registered in the Italian authorities' lists.
